SKP’s comments
The amendment proposed by Lok Sabha can be bucketed into three categories viz (i)which are against the taxpayers (ii) the provisions which are beneficial to taxpayers and (iii) provisions which are clarificatory in nature.
The provision which seeks to expand the reach of Significant Economic Presence even when the agreement for the transaction is signed outside India is adverse to foreign entities who are carrying out significant business transactions with India. Of course, where the country has treaty with India, this amendment would not have any impact till the time treaty is also amended.
However, the provisions introducing indexation benefit for unlisted shares as on 31 January, laying down the turnover cap of INR 250 million only during the years where the tax incentive for start up is claimed, doing away with compulsory acquisition of PAN by foreign entities where the transaction is entered into over INR 0.25 million in a financial year, relaxing the time limit for filing the CBCR report for some entitiesare some of the beneficial provisions for taxpayers.
The other amendments are more clarificatory in nature.
|